In the outcome of the consultation, which ran from November last year to late February this year, the DfT said that almost 80% of respondents did not agree with the proposal as set out.
Consultees had been asked whether they agreed with the options of splitting the franchise into two smaller arms, one comprising services in the Thames Valley and high-speed service groups, and the other comprising services in the West service group, but including long-distance services from Paddington to the South West peninsula.
There was also virtually no support for the idea amongst organisational respondents such as passenger groups, local authorities, LEPs and community rail partnerships.
“Many respondents identified the positive benefits they felt had resulted from the creation of a single, integrated Great Western franchise,” the consultation document said. “Conversely, the most common reasons cited for opposing the proposed split were that it would lead to poorer timetabling, particularly connectivity between services and poorer organisation of the franchise; that the franchise doesn’t need to be changed; and that it would lead to wasteful duplication.”
Despite this, there was support for “some form of decentralised decision-making within the franchise,” which respondents believed could help improve cooperation with some councils and other local groups.
Because of this, while the DfT has ruled out splitting up the franchise, it will require operator FirstGroup to demonstrate how it will achieve more decentralised decision-making within the franchise, helping ensure that “decisions reflect the needs of passengers in the different geographical areas and markets which the franchise serves.”
There was also virtually no support for the idea amongst organisational respondents such as passenger groups, local authorities, LEPs and community rail partnerships.
“Many respondents identified the positive benefits they felt had resulted from the creation of a single, integrated Great Western franchise,” the consultation document said. “Conversely, the most common reasons cited for opposing the proposed split were that it would lead to poorer timetabling, particularly connectivity between services and poorer organisation of the franchise; that the franchise doesn’t need to be changed; and that it would lead to wasteful duplication.”
Despite this, there was support for “some form of decentralised decision-making within the franchise,” which respondents believed could help improve cooperation with some councils and other local groups.
Because of this, while the DfT has ruled out splitting up the franchise, it will require operator FirstGroup to demonstrate how it will achieve more decentralised decision-making within the franchise, helping ensure that “decisions reflect the needs of passengers in the different geographical areas and markets which the franchise serves.”
The minority who did agree with breaking up the current franchise argued it would improve services, deliver better customer focus, increase competition, and lead to better integration.
The franchise is due for renewal at the end of March 2020.
Greater reliability and simpler ticketing
The franchise is due for renewal at the end of March 2020.
Greater reliability and simpler ticketing
Elsewhere, greater reliability and punctuality were amongst the most prominent demands of the public who responded to the consultation.
As well as the idea of breaking up the franchise, the public were invited to give their views on the most pressing issues for potential bidders to cover, as well as any other priorities they would wish to see addressed by the new TOC when the next contract is awarded in December next year.
The key themes to emerge from the comments related to reliability, economic growth, and environmental performance. Some 95 comments asked for a focus on advancing the regional economy, whilst 40 asked bidders to focus on passengers.
Proposed additions to priorities for the future tender include cheap fares and simpler pricing, more services, and better connectivity.
As well as the idea of breaking up the franchise, the public were invited to give their views on the most pressing issues for potential bidders to cover, as well as any other priorities they would wish to see addressed by the new TOC when the next contract is awarded in December next year.
The key themes to emerge from the comments related to reliability, economic growth, and environmental performance. Some 95 comments asked for a focus on advancing the regional economy, whilst 40 asked bidders to focus on passengers.
Proposed additions to priorities for the future tender include cheap fares and simpler pricing, more services, and better connectivity.
Respondents also called on the future TOC to focus on the needs of the travelling public. The report wrote: “Comments focused on reducing fares and the need for a simpler pricing system. Improved refund processes were mentioned and e-ticketing services were suggested. There were requests for more trains, services with more carriages and a focus on passenger comfort.
“Accessibility was a key theme with respondents commenting on disabled access and bicycle provision at stations. Some responses suggested introduction of an objective on wi-fi provision, noting that on-board wi-fi currently sporadic.”
Last year Great Western Rail was criticised for its poor record of responding to complaints from customers by Transport Focus.
“Accessibility was a key theme with respondents commenting on disabled access and bicycle provision at stations. Some responses suggested introduction of an objective on wi-fi provision, noting that on-board wi-fi currently sporadic.”
Last year Great Western Rail was criticised for its poor record of responding to complaints from customers by Transport Focus.
0 Response to "Great Western Franchise Will Not Be Split"
Post a Comment