The answer has been there all the time and both TfL and our orgs have completely missed it.
Listening to the licensing hearing from York yesterday, the subject was touched on more than once. But even so, no one seems to be picking up on this.
It’s not as if this has been kept secret (like the hacking of Uber customer details, Or GreyBall, or the UberRape stats, of the Uber fake medicals, or the 13,000 Uber drivers with fake DBS certificates), this has been mentioned on oath in two court cases, one in Canada, the other in London at the workers rights tribunal.
There was even an all org meeting called to discuss this issue at Taxi house (which I attended) and it turned out both the RMT and Unite hadn’t bothered to research the subject.
There was no follow up to this meeting.
All the time, the answer has been there and it doesn’t need an APPG parliamentary commission, or a Judicial review, or a million pound war chest.
So what is this magic bullet ?
Don’t just take my word for it, take the trouble to listen to the webcast in the York licensing post.
A number of the witnesses giving evidence said virtually the same thing.
Here is Lee Ward, Chairman of ALPHA, giving his objection at the Licensing hearing, it's just 3 minutes long but gives all the insight needed.
At a number of licence applications, Uber were asked a very simple question.
"Could you tell us who the contract for the journey is between...?"
Who accepts the booking, is it Uber or the driver?
We have been told twice under oath in court, that the driver accepts the booking and this is illegal !!!
At all applications where this question has been asked, Uber gave no reply and the application was subsequently withdrawn.
Why are our orgs not asking this question?
Why haven't TfL asked Uber this question?
PH operators Abstract of Law PHV act 1998.
Sometimes, the answer to the most complicated problems are quite simple.
0 Response to "It's Official, Uber Are Operating Illegally And TfL Are Complicit.... By Jim Thomas"
Post a Comment